Hi guys,
I've found 2 Foresters that I'm considering buying and I'd like to get your thoughts on which is a better long-term buy. I plan to keep it for at least 5 years, perhaps more.
2002 S-Turbo, 64000 miles. 1 Owner. £3500 (approx 5k incl VRT)
2003 2.0 XT, 86000 miles. £4950 (approx 7k incl VRT if I can knock sale price down a few hundred for cash)
Neither mentions a service history(worried that the S-Turbo will need a big expensive service coming up to replace cambelt etc and could be why it's being sold) but both are from second-hand car dealers (the XT is from a place that also sells second-hand Bentleys, Lambos, Ferraris, etc, and the other place sells Focus, 206, Multipla etc.).
Soooo, my question is which one is a better long-term buy? My head says the S-Turbo (low miles, low price, but gonna look very old in 5 years) but my heart says the XT (newer model, more comfort, better-looking). Bear in mind that I do not put up much mileage, approx 5-6k miles /year.
Opinions guys ?
Cheers,
PK.
I've found 2 Foresters that I'm considering buying and I'd like to get your thoughts on which is a better long-term buy. I plan to keep it for at least 5 years, perhaps more.
2002 S-Turbo, 64000 miles. 1 Owner. £3500 (approx 5k incl VRT)
2003 2.0 XT, 86000 miles. £4950 (approx 7k incl VRT if I can knock sale price down a few hundred for cash)
Neither mentions a service history(worried that the S-Turbo will need a big expensive service coming up to replace cambelt etc and could be why it's being sold) but both are from second-hand car dealers (the XT is from a place that also sells second-hand Bentleys, Lambos, Ferraris, etc, and the other place sells Focus, 206, Multipla etc.).
Soooo, my question is which one is a better long-term buy? My head says the S-Turbo (low miles, low price, but gonna look very old in 5 years) but my heart says the XT (newer model, more comfort, better-looking). Bear in mind that I do not put up much mileage, approx 5-6k miles /year.
Opinions guys ?
Cheers,
PK.
