rs

Denis555 said:
Tommy 555 said:
Haven never driven either car i couldnt argue the point with ya Dec , but i still think the sti cosworth made a show of the rs 500 on top gear , quicker than an evo 10 as well so imo the whole rs is best is a result of fords pr machine , until i drive one i doubt i'll change my mind

The cosworth is £50000 and the rs500 is £35000 , , the price difference is nearly the same difference as a impreza 2.0 rx and a impreza sti in the uk , so hardly a fair comparison

The car does drive very well for fwd , to make the car 4wd it would be overpriced for it's competors,ie. Astra vex ,megane rs250 etc

A basic rs in the uk is £25600, a basic sti is £28900 so why would both cars be compared?

The price difference here would be greater because of our vrt ,and road tax is double on the sti

But the sti is a Great car in it's class and price range but both cars new ,there is 25000 euro of a difference

I had a 2007 spec c toshi arai , totally different car to the rs , both around 300 bhp

I would say green is to much and blue isn't enough ,colour wise ,the rs500 only has 40 bhp more ,red stiching on the seats ,red painted callipers and a 3m wrap and black wheels



White rules ...... So do sti s......

:thumbsup:
 
i agree with alot of the points above but

the rs is not a car "i" could drive for a few reasons, its looks is way to much like a max power car, dont get me wrong, i like the look of it, i just couldnt drive one because i'd know everyone would think i was a boy racer, now i know most of you might think, why would i care what other people think. it would make me feel uncomfortable.

i think the tech gone into the rs is way beyond that of the sti but i think the sti from day one has been a great car and has aged well, the money that ford saved form not making it 4wd they put in to the interior and its a beautiful car on the inside with all the right touches, unlike the sti with its plain dash.

i dont even think both cars can be put into the same class, put both cars on a dry tarmac track and you might get the same lap times but put them on a wet tarmac back road or snow covered road or gravel road and the rs wont come close to the sti, i loved the sound of the rs when i got a spin in one but nothing comes close to the sound of a flat four, so thats another one for the subaru.

another one for the subaru is the fact that they can be modded to take more power and still handle it, try putting 500 bhp true the front wheels of the rs and see how fast it is? in fairness to the rs, ford have done an amazing job as the mk1 rs was torque steer nightmare but the new rs is unbelieveable, i found it hard to believe before i got a spin in one but it will have its limits, as above.

the topgear test was a joke, sti tested in the wet, rs tested in the dry, and with gezza a big ford fan to begin it was always going to be a one sided story.

rs = boy racer 2 door hatchback sti = man's 4 door rally car, you decide, i know which one i'd have.
 
Each to their own, they are both impressive machines, but come winter (the ones we are having lately anyway!) I know which one i'd have.
 
Back
Top