[quote author=fat-controller link=topic=19931.msg242982#msg242982 date=1261066680]
.. articles from famous motoring magazines.One thing that struck me as strange was they regarded the v5/6 type r as better than the 22b and even the evo 5 as a better road car,know having never driven a 22b i cant compare,but i thought the 22b was a superior car can anyone explain why the 22b is nearly 3 times the price if thats the case or is it just the rarity of the model.thanks
[/quote]
I think that quote was from EVO as they didn't like the over firm suspension set up and the fact that if pushed too hard the car would try to spit you off into the nearest ditch! The conclusion of that article was that the grip was like a video game but without the option to reload when, not if, it all goes wrong. (Probably explaines why the UK press car was killed!) The main reason they preferred the V5 Type R was that statistically it made the same 0-60 figures with possibly the Type-R being a bit faster but the 22B was more about in gear acceleration as the torque spread was much better. Also the Type R was more compliant on bumpy B roads. The wider track and tyres made the 22B torque and bump stear in road tests at the time which gave the impression of being more skittish compared to it's more 'normal' stablemates.
RE values, like any one off run of cars you're paying for the exclusivity more than the mechanicals, which were cobbled together from the STi parts bin of both existing and yet to be released cars at the time.
Hope that answers the question?