Surely it would show up on a car getting mapped weather its 99 ron or no better that 95 ron ?goosie208 said:they have to say E5 on the pumps
but don get the impression using E5 will be fine in the long run, its not the best fuel I'm told, though it is stated 99 RON, i am told by a highly regarded mapper, that it burns more like a 97, much like BP Ultimate in the UK is a "97 RON" fuel but burns like a 95, thats why its considered a no no for subarus over there
i think the reason so many Scoobs die over here is because of the fuel, unlike the UK where their 99 is actually 99....
get it mapped... thats what i plan to do,
sti bob said:Surely it would show up on a car getting mapped weather its 99 ron or no better that 95 ron ?
Has anyone got results from mapping this fuel over 95 ron ?
Lets say i drop a uk spec sti to the scooby clinic and get all their mods to support their sc420 turbo .(They suggest 420+ on V power )davelegacy™ said:maxol e5 and uk v power are world apart.
supporting mods is widely used term. as ken said all cars differ.
the difference at that level between lets say uk avcs and jdm avcs heads could alone be 15bhp.
10-15 bhp is far better that 50-55 bhp down, getting it mapped on 95 ron .davelegacy™ said:e5 vs Shell V power at that level again could be difference of 10-15bhp.
When you say 380 aera with uk heads ,this figure is based on 95ron ?davelegacy™ said:add that with uk sti heads you may see 380bhp area