R
Renno555
Guest
[quote author=Dagnut link=topic=5696.msg65386#msg65386 date=1204016612]
Pat did say the E5 was better in my car than 95 and booster???
[/quote]
I thought it made the same timing but a little more boost only without the booster. Could be wrong now. Which is good.
Your car made more timing and had less det then any other b4 so hard to judge. I do feal it must be better then 95 but on other cars it dident seem to be better at all. Now maybe its only that they cant get it consistant. Like I say my car was fine on 95 plus booster then I switched to E5 alone and Ive got DET. I would normally put it down to a bad batch of fuel.
Then Scooby KE who is mapped for 95 plus booster is running E5 alone without issue.
Either way going on what I know now I dont think its 99.2 ron or consistant.
Damo
Pat did say the E5 was better in my car than 95 and booster???
[/quote]
I thought it made the same timing but a little more boost only without the booster. Could be wrong now. Which is good.
Your car made more timing and had less det then any other b4 so hard to judge. I do feal it must be better then 95 but on other cars it dident seem to be better at all. Now maybe its only that they cant get it consistant. Like I say my car was fine on 95 plus booster then I switched to E5 alone and Ive got DET. I would normally put it down to a bad batch of fuel.
Then Scooby KE who is mapped for 95 plus booster is running E5 alone without issue.
Either way going on what I know now I dont think its 99.2 ron or consistant.
Damo